Making use of comparable health data to improve quality of care and outcomes in diabetes : The EUBIROD review of diabetes registries and data sources in Europe
Carinci , Fazbrizio; Stotl, Iztok; Cunningham, Scott; Poljicanin, Tamara; Pristas, Ivan; Traynor, Vivie; Olympios, George; Scoutellas, Vasos; Azzopardi, Joseph; Doggen, Kris; Sándor, János; Adany, Roza; Løvaas, Karianne F.; Jarosz-Chobot, Przemka; Polanska, Joanna; Pruna, Simion; de Lusignan, Simon; Monesi, Marcello; Di Bartolo, Paolo; Scheidt-Nave, Christa Elisabeth; Heidemann, Christin; Zucker, Inbar; Maurina, Anita; Lepiksone, Jana; Rossing, Peter; Arffman, Martti; Keskimäki, Ilmo; Gudbjörnsdottir, Soffia; Di Iorio, Concetta Tania; Dupont, Elisabeth; de Sabata, Stella; Klazinga, Niek; Massi Benedetti, Massimo (2021-10-11)
Carinci , Fazbrizio
Stotl, Iztok
Cunningham, Scott
Poljicanin, Tamara
Pristas, Ivan
Traynor, Vivie
Olympios, George
Scoutellas, Vasos
Azzopardi, Joseph
Doggen, Kris
Sándor, János
Adany, Roza
Løvaas, Karianne F.
Jarosz-Chobot, Przemka
Polanska, Joanna
Pruna, Simion
de Lusignan, Simon
Monesi, Marcello
Di Bartolo, Paolo
Scheidt-Nave, Christa Elisabeth
Heidemann, Christin
Zucker, Inbar
Maurina, Anita
Lepiksone, Jana
Rossing, Peter
Arffman, Martti
Keskimäki, Ilmo
Gudbjörnsdottir, Soffia
Di Iorio, Concetta Tania
Dupont, Elisabeth
de Sabata, Stella
Klazinga, Niek
Massi Benedetti, Massimo
11.10.2021
744516
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202301101227
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202301101227
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background: Registries and data sources contain information that can be used on an ongoing basis to improve quality of care and outcomes of people with diabetes. As a specific task of the EU Bridge Health project, we carried out a survey of diabetes-related data sources in Europe. Objectives: We aimed to report on the organization of different sources of diabetes information, including their governance, information infrastructure and dissemination strategies for quality control, service planning, public health, policy and research. Methods: Survey using a structured questionnaire to collect targeted data from a network of collaborating institutions managing registries and data sources in 17 countries in the year 2017. Results: The 18 data sources participating in the study were most frequently academic centres (44.4%), national (72.2%), targeting all types of diabetes (61.1%) covering no more than 10% of the target population (44.4%). Although population-based in over a quarter of cases (27.8%), sources relied predominantly on provider-based datasets (38.5%), fewer using administrative data (16.6%). Data collection was continuous in the majority of cases (61.1%), but 50% could not perform data linkage. Public reports were more frequent (72.2%) as well as quality reports (77.8%), but one third did not provide feedback to policy and only half published ten or more peer reviewed papers during the last 5 years. Conclusions: The heterogeneous implementation of diabetes registries and data sources hampers the comparability of quality and outcomes across Europe. Best practices exist but need to be shared more effectively to accelerate progress and deliver equitable results for people with diabetes.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [15251]