Usability factors associated with physicians' distress and information system-related stress : Cross-sectional survey
Heponiemi, Tarja; Kujala, Sari; Vainiomäki, Suvi; Vehko, Tuulikki; Lääveri, Tinja; Vänskä, Jukka; Ketola, Eeva; Puttonen, Sampsa; Hyppönen, Hannele (2019-10)
Heponiemi, Tarja
Kujala, Sari
Vainiomäki, Suvi
Vehko, Tuulikki
Lääveri, Tinja
Vänskä, Jukka
Ketola, Eeva
Puttonen, Sampsa
Hyppönen, Hannele
10 / 2019
e13466
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202210197701
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202210197701
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Background: Constantly changing and difficult-to-use information systems have arisen as a significant source of stress in physicians' work. Physicians have reported several usability problems, system failures, and a lack of integration between the systems and have experienced that systems poorly support the documentation and retrieval of patient data. This stress has kept rising in the 21st century, and it seems that it may also affect physicians' well-being. Objective: This study aimed to examine the associations of (1) usability variables (perceived benefits, technical problems, support for feedback, and user-friendliness), (2) the number of systems in daily use, (3) experience of using information systems, and (4) participation in information systems development work with physicians' distress and levels of stress related to information systems (SRIS) levels. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 4018 Finnish physicians (64.82%, 2572 out of 3968 women) aged between 24 and 64 years (mean 46.8 years) in 2017. The analyses of covariance were used to examine the association of independent variables with SRIS and distress (using the General Health Questionnaire) adjusted for age, gender, employment sector, specialization status, and the electronic health record system in use. Results: High levels of technical problems and a high number of systems in daily use were associated with high levels of SRIS, whereas high levels of user-friendliness, perceived benefits, and support for feedback were associated with low levels of SRIS. Moreover, high levels of technical problems were associated with high levels of psychological distress, whereas high levels of user-friendliness were associated with low distress levels. Those who considered themselves experienced users of information systems had low levels of both SRIS and distress. Conclusions: It seems that by investing in user-friendly systems with better technical quality and good support for feedback that professionals perceive as being beneficial would improve the work-related well-being and overall well-being of physicians. Moreover, improving physicians' skills related to information systems by giving them training could help to lessen the stress that results from poorly functioning information systems and improve physicians' well-being.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [19020]