Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice : Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group
Spada, Cristiano; Koulaouzidis, Anastasios; Hassan, Cesare; Amaro, Pedro; Agrawal, Anurag; Brink, Lene; Fischbach, Wolfgang; Hünger, Matthias; Jover, Rodrigo; Kinnunen, Urpo; Ono, Akiko; Patai, Árpád; Pecere, Silvia; Petruzziello, Lucio; Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand; Staines, Harry; Stringer, Ann L.; Toth, Ervin; Antonelli, Giulio; Fuccio, Lorenzo (2022-03-13)
Spada, Cristiano
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
Hassan, Cesare
Amaro, Pedro
Agrawal, Anurag
Brink, Lene
Fischbach, Wolfgang
Hünger, Matthias
Jover, Rodrigo
Kinnunen, Urpo
Ono, Akiko
Patai, Árpád
Pecere, Silvia
Petruzziello, Lucio
Riemann, Jürgen Ferdinand
Staines, Harry
Stringer, Ann L.
Toth, Ervin
Antonelli, Giulio
Fuccio, Lorenzo
13.03.2022
3388
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202207065995
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202207065995
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
BACKGROUND: The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group aims to raise awareness for improvement in colonoscopy standards across Europe. We analysed data collected on a sample of procedures conducted across Europe to evaluate the achievement of the polyp detection rate (PDR) target. We also investigated factors associated with PDR, in the hope of establishing areas that could lead to a quality improvement. METHODS: 6445 form completions from 12 countries between 2 June 2016 and 30 April 2018 were considered for this analysis. We performed an exploratory analysis looking at PDR according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) definition. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the most influential associated factors after adjusting for the other pre-specified variables. RESULTS: In our sample there were 3365 screening and diagnostic procedures performed in those over 50 years. The PDR was 40.5%, which is comparable with the ESGE minimum standard of 40%. The variables found to be associated with PDR were in descending order: use of high-definition equipment, body mass index (BMI), patient gender, age group, and the reason for the procedure. Use of HD equipment was associated with a significant increase in the reporting of flat lesions (14.3% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001) and protruded lesions (34.7% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: On average, the sample of European practice captured by the ECQI survey meets the minimum PDR standard set by the ESGE. Our findings support the ESGE recommendation for routine use of HD colonoscopy.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [12600]