Response to malnutrition treatment in low weight-for-age children : Secondary analyses of children 6–59 months in the compas cluster randomized controlled trial
Bailey, Jeanette; Lelijveld, Natasha; Khara, Tanya; Dolan, Carmel; Stobaugh, Heather; Sadler, Kate; Lako, Richard Lino; Briend, André; Opondo, Charles; Kerac, Marko; Myatt, Mark (2021)
Bailey, Jeanette
Lelijveld, Natasha
Khara, Tanya
Dolan, Carmel
Stobaugh, Heather
Sadler, Kate
Lako, Richard Lino
Briend, André
Opondo, Charles
Kerac, Marko
Myatt, Mark
2021
1054
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202107306423
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202107306423
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
Weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) is not currently an admission criterion to therapeutic feeding programs, and children with low WAZ at high risk of mortality may not be admitted. We conducted a secondary analysis of RCT data to assess response to treatment according to WAZ and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and type of feeding protocol given: a simplified, combined protocol for severe and moderate acute malnutrition (SAM and MAM) vs. standard care that treats SAM and MAM, separately. Children with a moderately low MUAC (11.5–12.5 cm) and a severely low WAZ (<−3) respond similarly to treatment in terms of both weight and MUAC gain on either 2092 kJ (500 kcal)/day of therapeutic or supplementary food. Children with a severely low MUAC (<11.5 cm), with/without a severely low WAZ (<−3), have similar recovery with the combined protocol or standard treatment, though WAZ gain may be slower in the combined protocol. A limitation is this analysis was not powered for these sub-groups specifically. Adding WAZ < −3 as an admission criterion for therapeutic feeding programs admitting children with MUAC and/or oedema may help programs target high-risk children who can benefit from treatment. Future work should evaluate the optimal treatment protocol for children with a MUAC < 11.5 and/or WAZ < −3.0.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [19288]