Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-based and Jiles-Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis
Upadhaya, Brijesh; Rasilo, Paavo; Perkkiö, Lauri; Handgruber, Paul; Belahcen, Anouar; Arkkio, Antero (2020)
Upadhaya, Brijesh
Rasilo, Paavo
Perkkiö, Lauri
Handgruber, Paul
Belahcen, Anouar
Arkkio, Antero
2020
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202004233552
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202004233552
Kuvaus
Peer reviewed
Tiivistelmä
In this paper, we apply an anisotropic extension for the energy-based and the Jiles-Atherton hysteresis models to simulate both unidirectional alternating and rotational magnetic field excitations. The results show a good agreement with measurements for unidirectional alternating fields. However, the results for rotational fields, especially at high magnitudes, show a significant discrepancy with the measurement data. We demonstrate that the Jiles-Atherton model with appropriate parameters can estimate the losses in alternating cases up to 1.5 T, whereas both models give reasonable loss estimation up to 1 T in rotational cases.
Kokoelmat
- TUNICRIS-julkaisut [19816]